FRAMEWORK · CoreAGK-000 v1.0Free preview

    AI Governance Framework and Document Architecture

    The map of the whole kit. It explains the five document levels, the two tracks, the three adoption tiers, the shared definitions, and how every document maps to ISO/IEC 42001 and the NIST AI RMF.

    Template version
    AGK-000 v1.0
    Format
    Word · 30 KB
    Used by
    AI Governance Lead, risk and compliance
    When
    Standard and Regulated adopters, first read
    Document type
    Framework (Reference)
    Owner
    [AI Governance Lead]
    Approved by
    [AI Governance Committee]
    Review cycle
    Annual
    Parent document(s)
    —
    Adoption tier
    Lite: Required · Standard: Required · Regulated: Required
    AGK-000_AI_Governance_Framework_and_Document_Architecture_v1.0.docx

    1. Purpose

    This framework establishes how [CLIENT NAME] governs artificial intelligence (AI) — both the AI tools our people use and the AI systems and agents we build or commission. It defines the governance document hierarchy, the documents in force, how they relate, and the shared definitions used across all of them.

    The framework is model-agnostic. Policies and standards state outcomes that apply to any AI vendor or model. Vendor-specific settings are kept in separate Vendor Annexes so that a change of vendor, or a vendor feature release, does not require board re-approval of policy.

    2. Design principles

    Principle What it means in this kit
    Model-agnostic Policies and standards never name a vendor. Vendor settings live in Vendor Annexes (AGK-ANX-*).
    Proportionate Three adoption tiers (Lite, Standard, Regulated). Controls are tagged by the minimum tier at which they apply.
    Use and Build separated Track A governs staff use of AI tools; Track B governs building and operating AI systems and agents. Both share one Core.
    Enforced as configuration Wherever possible a control is implemented as a platform setting, not only as a rule people must remember.
    Named accountability Every AI system, connector and agent has a named human owner recorded in a register.
    Evidence by design Every mandatory control has an ID so evidence can be collected and audited against it.
    Regulation-ready Mapped to NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, Malaysia AIGE and PDPA, Singapore Model AI Governance Frameworks and MAS guidance, and the EU AI Act.

    3. Document hierarchy

    Governance documents are organised in five levels. A lower-level document may add detail but must not contradict a higher-level document. Where documents conflict, the higher level prevails.

    Level Type (prefix) Answers Binding Approved by Typical change frequency
    1 Policy (POL) Why and what — principles, scope, “shall” statements Mandatory [Board / CEO] Annual or on law change
    2 Standard (STD) What exactly — testable controls with IDs Mandatory [AI Governance Committee] 6–12 months
    3 Procedure (PRC) How — step-by-step workflow, owners, SLAs Mandatory [Control owner] As needed
    3 Guideline (GDL) How, recommended — practical advice Recommended [Control owner] As needed
    4 Template (TPL) Records — forms and registers Record — Living
    5 Vendor Annex (ANX) Where — vendor settings implementing each control Implementation [AI Platform Administrator] Monthly review

    Example — one requirement through four levels

    A policy says: “AI agents shall not perform irreversible actions without human approval.”

    The standard turns it into a control: “AGK-STD-A03-C09 — Each write or act tool on a connector shall be set to”needs approval” or “blocked”.”

    The procedure explains how a request to enable a write tool is assessed and approved.

    The Vendor Annex states the exact setting on each platform, e.g. the per-tool permission set to “Needs approval”.

    4. Tracks and document register

    Two tracks, one core

    Track A — AI Use Governance Track B — AI Build Governance (AgentOps)
    Question How do our people use AI tools safely? How do we build and run AI systems and agents safely?
    Audience All staff, AI platform administrators, AIGC Engineers, architects, product and platform teams
    Governs Enterprise AI assistants, connectors, browser and computer-use agents, skills and custom instructions, data input Agent design, identity and access, evaluation and release, guardrails, monitoring, remediation, model and prompt change
    Our role Deployer / user Developer, and deployer of in-house systems

    The Core (charter, policies, risk assessment, register, vendor assessment, incident response, recertification, training, transparency) applies to both tracks. An in-house agent and a SaaS AI tool go into the same AI System Register, use the same risk tiers and follow the same incident procedure.

    Document register

    Legend: ● Required · ◐ Condensed version acceptable · ◇ Required once the feature is enabled for any user · ○ Optional · “If used” = adopt the annex for each AI platform in use.

    The rest of this section and 12 sections are in the download

    You have read about 19% of this document. The editable Word file comes with the free Lite pack.

    Get the full document

    Free AI Governance Lite pack

    The documents an organisation starting out needs to govern AI tools in its first 90 days. Word and Excel, ready to edit.

    • Lite Quick Start and Control Checklist AGK-001 · Word
    • AI Governance Framework and Document Architecture AGK-000 · Word
    • AI Acceptable Use Policy AGK-POL-02 · Word
    • AI Data Handling Standard AGK-STD-A02 · Word
    • AI Discovery and Shadow AI Procedure AGK-PRC-07 · Word
    • AI Adoption Roadmap and Use-Case Prioritisation Guide AGK-GDL-C02 · Word
    • AI System Register AGK-TPL-01 · ExcelPreview AI System Register
    • AI Use Case Intake Form AGK-TPL-03 · Word
    • AI Incident, Nonconformity and CAPA Log AGK-TPL-06 · ExcelPreview AI Incident, Nonconformity and CAPA Log
    • AI Acceptable Use Acknowledgement AGK-TPL-07 · Word
    • Pengakuan Penggunaan AI (Bahasa Melayu) AGK-TPL-07-BM · Word
    • AI Use-Case Prioritisation and Benefits Tracker AGK-TPL-12 · ExcelPreview AI Use-Case Prioritisation and Benefits Tracker

    Template release v1.0 · ZIP · 733 KB

    Download AI Governance Framework and Document Architecture and the Lite pack

    Your details for this download

    We use your details to send this download and to understand which documents are useful. Marketing emails only if you tick the box.

    Templates for governance purposes, not legal advice.

    Powered by EzyChat