- Template version
- AGK-000 v1.0
- Format
- Word · 30 KB
- Used by
- AI Governance Lead, risk and compliance
- When
- Standard and Regulated adopters, first read
- Document type
- Framework (Reference)
- Owner
- [AI Governance Lead]
- Approved by
- [AI Governance Committee]
- Review cycle
- Annual
- Parent document(s)
- —
- Adoption tier
- Lite: Required · Standard: Required · Regulated: Required
1. Purpose
This framework establishes how [CLIENT NAME] governs artificial intelligence (AI) — both the AI tools our people use and the AI systems and agents we build or commission. It defines the governance document hierarchy, the documents in force, how they relate, and the shared definitions used across all of them.
The framework is model-agnostic. Policies and standards state outcomes that apply to any AI vendor or model. Vendor-specific settings are kept in separate Vendor Annexes so that a change of vendor, or a vendor feature release, does not require board re-approval of policy.
2. Design principles
| Principle | What it means in this kit |
|---|---|
| Model-agnostic | Policies and standards never name a vendor. Vendor settings live in Vendor Annexes (AGK-ANX-*). |
| Proportionate | Three adoption tiers (Lite, Standard, Regulated). Controls are tagged by the minimum tier at which they apply. |
| Use and Build separated | Track A governs staff use of AI tools; Track B governs building and operating AI systems and agents. Both share one Core. |
| Enforced as configuration | Wherever possible a control is implemented as a platform setting, not only as a rule people must remember. |
| Named accountability | Every AI system, connector and agent has a named human owner recorded in a register. |
| Evidence by design | Every mandatory control has an ID so evidence can be collected and audited against it. |
| Regulation-ready | Mapped to NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, Malaysia AIGE and PDPA, Singapore Model AI Governance Frameworks and MAS guidance, and the EU AI Act. |
3. Document hierarchy
Governance documents are organised in five levels. A lower-level document may add detail but must not contradict a higher-level document. Where documents conflict, the higher level prevails.
| Level | Type (prefix) | Answers | Binding | Approved by | Typical change frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Policy (POL) | Why and what — principles, scope, “shall” statements | Mandatory | [Board / CEO] | Annual or on law change |
| 2 | Standard (STD) | What exactly — testable controls with IDs | Mandatory | [AI Governance Committee] | 6–12 months |
| 3 | Procedure (PRC) | How — step-by-step workflow, owners, SLAs | Mandatory | [Control owner] | As needed |
| 3 | Guideline (GDL) | How, recommended — practical advice | Recommended | [Control owner] | As needed |
| 4 | Template (TPL) | Records — forms and registers | Record | — | Living |
| 5 | Vendor Annex (ANX) | Where — vendor settings implementing each control | Implementation | [AI Platform Administrator] | Monthly review |
|
Example — one requirement through four levels A policy says: “AI agents shall not perform irreversible actions without human approval.” The standard turns it into a control: “AGK-STD-A03-C09 — Each write or act tool on a connector shall be set to”needs approval” or “blocked”.” The procedure explains how a request to enable a write tool is assessed and approved. The Vendor Annex states the exact setting on each platform, e.g. the per-tool permission set to “Needs approval”. |
4. Tracks and document register
Two tracks, one core
| Track A — AI Use Governance | Track B — AI Build Governance (AgentOps) | |
|---|---|---|
| Question | How do our people use AI tools safely? | How do we build and run AI systems and agents safely? |
| Audience | All staff, AI platform administrators, AIGC | Engineers, architects, product and platform teams |
| Governs | Enterprise AI assistants, connectors, browser and computer-use agents, skills and custom instructions, data input | Agent design, identity and access, evaluation and release, guardrails, monitoring, remediation, model and prompt change |
| Our role | Deployer / user | Developer, and deployer of in-house systems |
The Core (charter, policies, risk assessment, register, vendor assessment, incident response, recertification, training, transparency) applies to both tracks. An in-house agent and a SaaS AI tool go into the same AI System Register, use the same risk tiers and follow the same incident procedure.
Document register
Legend: ● Required · ◐ Condensed version acceptable · ◇ Required once the feature is enabled for any user · ○ Optional · “If used” = adopt the annex for each AI platform in use.
The rest of this section and 12 sections are in the download
You have read about 19% of this document. The editable Word file comes with the free Lite pack.
Get the full document